Pro-Lifers not told what to think of “Morning After Pills” yet?
False Pregnancy - Who really wants to debate the morning-after pill?
“Why the silence? Because from a strategic standpoint, it’s a stinker of an issue for pro-lifers. In recent years, they’ve gained the upper hand by focusing relentlessly on late-term fetuses that look like babies.”
I love it!
Abortion can be argued to a certain degree because a life is involved. The Pro-Life crowd hasn’t figured out how to argue about “Morning After Pills” yet without looking like they’re trying to meddle in someone’s life. (Which we all know they are!)
I wish my life was as uncomplicated as those that have all the time in the world to concern themselves with other people’s sex lives… don’t you?






April 26th, 2005 at 3:13 pm
Of course you know that some religions refuse to let anything stand in the way of successful reproduction, no matter what the cost. I think they just elected a new leader about a week or so ago. Now what was their name again……?
April 27th, 2005 at 4:10 pm
Put me down for being “Against Babies”
April 28th, 2005 at 4:20 pm
I can see it now… a pro-lifer standing outside of a Planned Parenthood clinic, holding up a picket sign with a photo of sperm on it… “Please Mommy, don’t kill me”, says the caption. Not quite as moving, eh?